Steelers notebook: Thousands show up for NFL 'block party'
LONDON — Steeler Nation relocated to an entirely new nation on Saturday.
Steelers players including Ben Roethlisberger, Antonio Brown, Heath Miller, Ryan Clark, Lawrence Timmons and Ike Taylor, plus owners Dan and Art Rooney II, were overwhelmed by the tens of thousands of fans who turned out for a pregame Steelers-Vikings “block party” rally along a closed-down Regent Street, one of London's main thoroughfares.
It would have been the equivalent of shutting down 5th Avenue in New York for a similar fete. Brown delighted the crowd by performing his touchdown dance, and multiple players and Dan Rooney spoke.
It was exactly what the NFL is looking for as it awaits what appears to be a certain move to London, though not necessarily in the next few years: Fervent fan support.
Unkind history for RBs
So how will rookie running back Le'Veon Bell perform in his Steelers debut Sunday?
“I can't wait to go out there and show people what I can do,” said Bell, who missed three games with a mid-foot sprain.
Based on the first-game performances of other notable Steelers draft picks, he probably won't do very well.
Franco Harris, the first-round pick in 1972, had 10 carries for 28 yards against the Raiders. Walter Abercrombie, a first-round pick in 1982, had all of one yard on one carry against the Seahawks. Tim Worley, a 1989 first-rounder, ran 10 times for 36 yards in a 51-0 loss to the Browns.
Rashard Mendenhall, a first-rounder in 2008, gained 28 yards on 10 carries against the Texans.
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.