ShareThis Page

Steelers finding offensive balance

| Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. — Todd Haley has been criticized for crafting an offense that can't generate enough ground power to lift some of the burden off quarterback Ben Roethlisberger.

Again, a troubled run game was largely defused by the New York Jets' defense during the Steelers' 19-6 victory at MetLife Stadium. Somehow, it was efficient enough — or posed some semblance of a threat — to loosen up the Jets' secondary.

Running back Le'Veon Bell had a career-high 16 carries but averaged only 2.1 yards. If nothing else, the Jets couldn't ignore him. As a result, Roethlisberger's play-action passes were largely effective against the Jets' blitzes and man coverage.

A patient Roethlisberger didn't bite off more than he could chew. Instead, he picked apart the Jets in the first half with short and intermediate throws to receiver Antonio Brown and tight end Heath Miller, who combined for 11 catches before halftime.

The Steelers' air game was aided some by the Atlanta-Jets game film. The Falcons exploited the middle of the Jets' secondary; their receivers worked the boundaries to allow tight end Tony Gonzalez to exploit man coverage for 10 catches for 97 yards.

“We saw what Atlanta did (on film), but each week is different,” said Miller, who finished with six receptions. “I was able to catch a lot of balls, but much of that was the quarterback play was good all the way around.

“It's just the way things shook out. Ben did a good job of finding the open guy and putting the ball where it was supposed to be.”

Miller and Brown forced the Jets to deploy a cover-2 defense in an effort to narrow the wide seams in the middle of the field. Miller and Brown totaled 170 receiving yards, but 55 of Emmanuel Sanders' 70 yards on a play-action pass early in the third quarter enabled the Steelers to gain a 16-6 advantage in a defensive slugfest.

The Steelers' passing game has been relatively up and down, but it was remarkably efficient against the second-ranked defense in the NFL. Roethlisberger posted a season-best passer rating of 113.8, which was bolstered some by his third-and-1 touchdown strike to Sanders.

“It's starting to come around,” said Sanders, who caught three passes. “We're starting to gain some chemistry on the deep balls, but we have to continue to work at it. We have to make plays for this team to be successful.”

Admittedly, Roethlisberger was skeptical of Haley's call on third down, in part, because he wanted the offensive line to prove it could best the Jets' mammoth defensive front. Besides, it would have been a confidence-builder for a run game that has failed to reach 100 yards.

“I was a little hesitant at first, and I thought we should grind it in there because the (offensive line) had done a good job,” Roethlisberger said. “After we broke the huddle, I thought that this was a good play call and that it could be good for us.”

The Steelers came within inches of connecting on two other deep balls. In the third quarter, the ball slipped off Sanders' fingertips 40 yards downfield, and Brown couldn't corral a back-shoulder throw as he stumbled into the end zone.

“We were on our Ps and Qs and just getting open, but we need to get better,” Brown said. “It's what we're going to have to do if we want to win.”

Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @RalphPaulk_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.