For the most part, the Steelers' kick return teams have rarely impacted any game this season. But Antonio Brown, Felix Jones and Emmanuel Sanders gave the offense good field position.
Brown returned a first-quarter punt 18 yards to jump-start the Steelers' first scoring drive, which ended with a 3-yard scoring pass from Ben Roethlisberger to Heath Miller.
Jones closed the first half with a 42-yard kickoff return. He moved the pile nearly 10 yards before getting cut down at the Steelers' 40.
After the Ravens tied the game 16-16 late in the fourth quarter, Sanders returned the ensuing kickoff 44 yards, setting the stage for Shaun Suisham's game-winning 42-yard field goal as time expired.
Moye, Paulson catching on
Wide receiver Derek Moye and tight end David Paulson have been quiet for much of this season. But both made big plays Sunday.
Moye, cast in the role of Roethlisberger's big red-zone target, had a 19-yard catch. Paulson, a starter while Miller recovered from knee injury, caught a 17-yard pass to ignite a Steelers drive that ended with a Suisham field goal for a 13-6 Steelers lead.
Big on first down
The Steelers, buoyed by an efficient run game, averaged nearly 7 yards on first down. Coach Mike Tomlin credited offensive coordinator Todd Haley for mixing up the game plan. “If you can run the ball efficiently, then you can dial up play-passes and things associated with it and keep people off-balance,” Tomlin said.
Offensive tackle Marcus Gilbert suffered a right quad injury on the Steelers' first possession. He did not return and was replaced by Guy Whimper. Defensive end Brett Keisel suffered a rib injury for the second week in a row. He was injured in the third quarter, but returned.
Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @RalphPaulk_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.