Share This Page

Steelers can't afford another loss to Raiders

| Tuesday, Oct. 22, 2013, 8:03 p.m.
Oakland Raiders quarterback Terrelle Pryor will play against his childhood team, a team he said 'no thanks' to in the 2011 supplemental draft: the Steelers.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Fans in Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum’s so-called Black Hole watch a game between the Raiders and Lions in late August in Oakland, Calif. During the Steelers’ last visit in 2006, quarterback Ben Roethlisberger threw four interceptions in a 20-13 loss.

The Steelers must avoid falling into a black hole in Oakland, and they know it.

With the Steelers (2-4) probably needing to go 8-2 in their final 10 games to assure themselves of reaching the playoffs, they can't afford yet another bad loss to a bad Raiders team — something that's occurred three times in seven seasons.

Just such losses in 2006, 2009 and 2012 — to Raiders teams that won only 11 games combined in those three seasons — ultimately cost the Steelers any chance for the playoffs.

Losing Sunday at O.co Coliseum, known as the Black Hole because the black-bedecked fans can be as menacing and intimidating as the team they support, could be just as punishing to a Steelers team that finally has some confidence and momentum.

Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger is 1-3 against Oakland, throwing 10 touchdown passes but five interceptions.

“I don't think there's anything mystical about it,” Roethlisberger said Tuesday on his radio show. “Obviously, it's a big-time tradition football team — the Black Hole, the fans. And I've been asked, is it the West Coast? Is it the field? No, they just happened to beat us the last couple of times we played there.”

There's also this: The Steelers seem to struggle whenever they leave the confines of their own time zone. They've lost their past seven games outside the Eastern time zone, dating to a Nov. 27, 2011, win at Kansas City, and they're 0-4 on the West Coast since beating San Diego in 2005.

“Obviously, they are a group that provides some concern for us for a lot of reasons,” coach Mike Tomlin said.

Tomlin's chief worry about the Raiders (2-4) isn't the venue or the recent history but the emergence of former Jeannette star Terrelle Pryor as a multi-dimensional threat.

Pryor's 84.8 quarterback rating is higher than that of multiple Super Bowl winners Tom Brady and Eli Manning, and he has run for 285 yards — more than any Steelers player. He also has a 6.5 yards-per-carry average.

“He's a guy to deal with,” Tomlin said. “I think they utilize his skill set nicely in their offense, some zone-read stuff, some designed runs and pocket movements. He has a nice touch on his ball. He is throwing a good deep ball. He is really doing a nice job of staying within himself and working with the pieces that he has around him.”

Mobile quarterbacks — see Tim Tebow — also have been a problem for the Steelers, so Tomlin said it's a necessity for his defense to remain disciplined.

Another concern to Tomlin is that inside linebacker Lawrence Timmons, the Steelers' most consistent defensive player, will play with a broken left hand he suffered late in the Ravens game Sunday. He is wearing a cast but, Tomlin said, has mobility in his fingers.

Timmons made 17 tackles against Baltimore and leads the Steelers with 66, or 22 more than any other player. Timmons' presence on the inside makes it less likely Pryor will attempt any tricky running between the tackles; Pryor has been sacked 20 times — only one fewer than Roethlisberger.

What the Steelers can't afford to do is get sacked in Oakland, unless they are to put themselves in a position where they must win out to reach the postseason.

“We're still in a hole, and we're trying to get out,” Roethlisberger said.

And, this time, he didn't mean the Black Hole.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at arobinson@tribweb.com or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.