ShareThis Page

Robinson: Variety of talent available among 2014 Top 10 picks

| Saturday, Nov. 16, 2013, 10:00 p.m.

The Steelers haven't drafted higher than 15th in nine seasons and since they took Terry Bradshaw No. 1 overall in 1970, their highest pick was No. 7 overall.

But should they never get turned around in a season that began with four consecutive losses, they could own their first top-10 pick since they drafted wide receiver Plaxico Burress at No. 8 in 2000.

It would be a pick the Steelers simply can't whiff on — their troubles are partly the result of them not having a single current starter from either the 2008 or '09 draft classes. (Five picks start for other teams.) Their only remaining player from those drafts is defensive end Ziggy Hood.

Here's who the Steelers might have to choose from May 8 if they go top 10:

• A left tackle? NFL draft expert Mel Kiper of ESPN said Jake Matthews of Texas A&M, Brandon Scherff of Iowa and Greg Robinson of Auburn all could be there. Scherff is a former high school quarterback who simply outgrew the position and, Kiper said, “is a dominating run blocker, light on his feet.”

• Another defensive end, who would be their third taken in the first round in six years? Stephon Tuitt, tossed out of Notre Dame's loss to Pitt last weekend, is the best at the position, Kiper said, and should be perfect for a 3-4 defense. “He's been unblockable in a number of games,” Kiper said. “He's a top-10 guy.”

• A quarterback? Not likely, unless contract extension talks with Ben Roethlisberger break down. Kiper thinks as many as six QBs could go in Round 1, led by Teddy Bridgewater of Louisville, Marcus Mariota of Oregon and Johnny Manziel of Texas A&M.

• A wide receiver? The Steelers might need one if Emmanuel Sanders leaves via free agency. Sammy Watkins of Clemson and Marqise Lee of Southern Cal are projected as top-10 picks.

Fit to be tied

It's largely forgotten now, but the 1963 Steelers who played the Bears to a 17-17 tie at Forbes Field two days after President John F. Kennedy was slain nearly tied their way to a title.

There were five NFL ties that season. The Steelers played three, including a 20-20 tie with the Eagles the following week. (It was the last Steelers game played at Forbes Field. The crowd of 16,721 was nearly 20,000 less than the 36,465 who turned out for the Bears game on a national day of mourning.)

The Steelers were 7-3-3 going into their season finale at New York (10-3). If they had repeated an earlier 31-0 win over the Giants, they would have won the Eastern Conference title and played the Bears in a rematch for the NFL championship.

How could a team with two fewer wins prevail in so short a season, only 14 games? Because the NFL threw out ties when calculating a team's winning percentage, so the Steelers (.727), with eight wins, would have edged the Giants (.714), with 10 wins. It became moot when the Steelers lost 33-17.

Incidentally, the Bears (11-1-2) tied the Vikings by that same 17-17 score a week after tying the Steelers in Pittsburgh.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.