CLEVELAND — Cleveland Browns quarterback Jason Campbell said Wednesday he never took seriously reports that the Steelers were considering shopping around quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, whom he'll face Sunday at Cleveland Browns Stadium.
Campbell, who replaced Brandon Weeden as the Browns' starter, will square off against Roethlisberger for the first time since the Steelers' 23-6 win over Washington on Nov. 3, 2008, a game in which Roethlisberger left with a shoulder injury at halftime.
“I've always watched Roethlisberger throughout his career,” said Campbell, who tossed two interceptions when he last faced the Steelers. “When they started out 0-4, I heard people say they should trade Ben. How can people say that, especially in Pittsburgh? What they were saying was that they were 0-4 because of one person. The last time I checked, it was a 53-man roster.
“But Ben's the kind of a guy who is thinking about what he can do to make the team better. The one thing about football is that people like to say the quarterback loses all the games. It's not necessarily true.”
Campbell said what separates Roethlisberger from most active quarterbacks is that he's a two-time Super Bowl champion.
“It's why no one thinks he'll be traded,” Campbell added.
Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @RalphPaulk_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.