Steelers notebook: Haley hopes offense can revive run game
With the Steelers on pace for one of their best passing seasons, it's obvious to offensive coordinator Todd Haley what they need: a breakout running game.
Only Sunday against the Cleveland Browns might be a difficult game for it to happen.
The Browns are one of three teams that haven't allowed a 300-yard passer or a 100-yard rusher, and they're No. 5 overall defensively.
The Steelers have been waiting for rookie Le'Veon Bell to jump-start their running game, but with inconsistent blocking from an ever-shifting cast of offensive linemen, he averages only 3.1 yards per carry.
“What we need is a couple of breakout runs,” Haley said. “We are earning every yard. When the long run (of a game) is 13 (yards), it's hard to get that total up very far. You need one of those with everybody chasing them down the sideline.”
With the Steelers running less effectively than in any season since 1966, they're running out of time to find a reliable component to complement Ben Roethlisberger's throwing and Antonio Brown's catching.
“As we move into late November and December, I think you have to be able to run the football effectively when they know you are running it,” Haley said.
Keep streak alive?
The Steelers committed eight turnovers and ran for only 49 yards in losing in Cleveland, 20-14, last season. But they haven't dropped successive games there since losing four in a row from 1990-93.
Feeling no love
Emmanuel Sanders found out early in his career what Cleveland fans think of the Steelers.
“My dad, he went to Cleveland, and he's sitting in the stands, and he almost got into an argument with a guy who threatened to throw his beer on him because he was wearing a Steelers jersey,” Sanders said. “So that didn't play too well.”
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.