Likely loss of Steelers draft pick looms because of Tomlin misstep
By Alan Robinson| Sunday, Dec. 8, 2013, 12:56 p.m.
The Steelers and the NFL refused to confirm the team will be stripped of a late-round draft pick for coach Mike Tomlin's sideline mishap in Baltimore on Thanksgiving.
CBS Sports reported Sunday the league will take a lower-round pick from the Steelers.
The NFL is not expected to announce further Steelers' punishment — Tomlin was fined $100,000 last week — until after the draft order is finalized and compensatory picks are awarded during the league's March meetings.
The team has not been told what the possible punishment will be.
When the NFL announced its punishment for Tomlin's sidestep onto the field and into the vicinity of the Ravens' Jacoby Jones during his 73-yard kickoff return, this language was included:
“Because the conduct affected a play on the field, a modification or forfeiture of draft picks will be considered after the final order of the 2014 draft has been determined.”
The key wording of the statement appears to be “draft picks.” A late-round pick could be one of those picks, but an additional pick might be considered if the Ravens miss the playoffs because of lost points they would have gained had Jones scored.
Point differential is down the list of tiebreakers, and the chances of that coming into play are unlikely.
The NFL is not expected to make any other statement until the draft order is finalized.
The Steelers anticipated a Tomlin fine and possibly a franchise fine, but they did not expect to lose a draft pick, even a low-round selection.
The team anticipates receiving extra draft picks in 2014 as a result of losing Mike Wallace, Keenan Lewis and Rashard Mendenhall in free agency.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.