ShareThis Page

Chance to keep Bengals from clinching is incentive for Steelers

| Saturday, Dec. 14, 2013, 9:57 p.m.
Steelers defensive lineman Cameron Heyward presures the Bengals' Andy Dalton Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers defensive lineman Cameron Heyward presures the Bengals' Andy Dalton Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Bengals linebacker James Harrison returns to Pittsburgh to face the Steelers on Sunday.
Getty Images
Bengals linebacker James Harrison returns to Pittsburgh to face the Steelers on Sunday.

When the Steelers' season started nearly 3 12 months ago, with the usual expectations of a winning record and playoff run, this figured to be perhaps the biggest game on their schedule.

Cincinnati at home before a national audience on a mid-December Sunday night, James Harrison back in the house, their defense making Andy Dalton's life miserable, playoff implications all around.

Bring on the cold, bring on the Bengals, bring on No. 92, bring on January.

Uh, never mind.

NBC elected to keep this as its game of the week, but the only team in Heinz Field that has much to play for is Cincinnati (9-4), which can clinch the AFC North with a win in Pittsburgh for the second successive season and a Baltimore (7-6) loss at Detroit (7-6) on Monday night.

The Steelers (5-8)? Their incentive heading into a three-game closing stretch that hasn't been this unimportant since 2003 is to avoid their first losing record in 10 years — and to dodge the first such sub-.500 records for coach Mike Tomlin and Ben Roethlisberger.

Pardon the Steelers for harrumphing a few “Bah, humbugs.”

“We've got three games to get to .500,” Roethlisberger said, outlining as bleak an early winter's scenario as this cast of Steelers has ever had.

There are complicated routes to the playoffs for the Steelers — amazingly — but they require the Ravens and Dolphins to lose out and the Chargers to fold, too. Not even the Pythagorean theorem is as complicated as this formula.

A few weeks ago, the Steelers were playing to remain, as Tomlin said, relevant. Now, another “r” word is in their vocabulary: respect.

“Those guys (the Bengals) came into our house last year and ruined our playoff opportunity,” wide receiver Antonio Brown said. “We went into their house on a Monday night (in September) and took a beating pretty good (a 20-10 loss). We have an opportunity in front of our hometown fans (to) give them a glimpse of a Steelers team that's finishing regardless of circumstances.”

Brown and Roethlisberger have some personal incentives as each can finish up team record-setting statistical seasons.

But, otherwise, their fans can use their final two home games — the Steelers close it out Dec. 29 against Cleveland — to say hello to a returning Harrison and goodbye to a cast of players who won't be back next season. That group could include Brett Keisel, Ryan Clark and Emmanuel Sanders, all of whom are unsigned for next season.

And what kind of reception will Harrison get? He probably will hear a mix of cheers and boos as former Steelers wide receiver Mike Wallace did last week with Miami.

“It will be a big deal because he's James and what he's done,” Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said. “He's had an exceptional career. Guys like that eventually wind up in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. You can't take that away, and being a big bully along the way with it.”

A big bully? James Harrison?

“A very respectful bully, and that's the best part of him,” Lewis said.

The best part of Harrison's career was in Pittsburgh, and no doubt he's glad he never saw a season like this, one in which the Steelers have been bullied rather than doing the bullying.

“Maybe in the offseason we'll look back and scratch our heads,” Roethlisberger said.

There's plenty of time for that now, too.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.