ShareThis Page

Browns fire coach Chudzinski

| Sunday, Dec. 29, 2013, 7:24 p.m.
Browns head coach Rob Chudzinski coaches against the Steelers at Heinz Field Sunday, Dec. 8, 2013. The Steelers defeated the Browns 20-7.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Browns head coach Rob Chudzinski coaches against the Steelers at Heinz Field Sunday, Dec. 8, 2013. The Steelers defeated the Browns 20-7.

The Cleveland Browns lost seven straight games and 10 of their last 11 to finish the season 4-12, and it cost coach Rob Chudzinski his job.

After just one season.

The organization announced Sunday night that it had fired Chudzinski.

“We needed to see progress with this football team. We needed to see development and improvement as the season evolved, and unfortunately we took a concerning step backward in the second half of the year,” the team said in a statement. “Our fans deserve to see a consistently competitive team. We have high standards, and there's an urgency for success. When we believed we were not positioned to achieve significant progress in 2014, we knew we had to admit that a change was needed, and move forward.”

Speculation about Chudzinski's future was so rampant during the Browns' 20-7 loss to the Steelers at Heinz Field that the organization issued the following statement mid-game: “We will not discuss any evaluation of the season until this upcoming week.”

They waited less than six hours.

After the game, Chudzinski said he hadn't discussed his future with ownership.

“This next week we'll look and start reviewing the season and looking at every aspect of the program and doing those evaluations,” he said.

Chudzinski insisted he was “on the same page” with team owner Jimmy Haslam and CEO Joe Banner. Chudzinski said he expected to be back next season.

The team's dismal performance after a promising 3-2 start prompted a change. Still, Browns players voiced support for Chudzinski after Sunday's loss.

Pro Bowl left tackle Joe Thomas went so far as to say that if Chudzinski is fired, it “severely damages the organization.”

Many players offered support despite reports the locker room lacked accountability.

“I think everybody in this locker room is held accountable, not only by Coach but by the other players,” safety T.J. Ward said.

“If we didn't believe in him, then we wouldn't play for him. If you have guys playing until the end of the season when there's nothing to play for, you know you have a good coach.”

Thomas and Pro Bowl tight end Jordan Cameron endorsed giving Chudzinski more time to create a winning culture.

“I would say we need some stability,” Cameron said. “To move forward with the same group of coaches is definitely a plus.

“I like (Chudzinski). I like everything he stands for. I believe in him, and he's a fighter. He has everything that we need in a head coach.”

Chudzinski said questions of his future “come with the territory” of being an NFL coach on a losing team.

Ward, who finished his fourth season with the Browns, echoed that sentiment.

“Nothing surprises me,” he said. “I've been through three coaches.”

As much as his players support him, Chudzinski failed to produce results. His 4-12 record was a game worse than the 5-11 mark that got Pat Shurmur fired after last season.

The Browns finished at the bottom of the AFC North and are locked into the fourth pick in April's draft, giving them two first-round selections thanks to the trade that sent running back Trent Richardson to the Indianapolis Colts earlier this season.

Gary Horvath is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.