ShareThis Page

Robinson: NFL avoids near blackout embarrassment

| Saturday, Jan. 4, 2014, 4:12 p.m.

The thought of blacked-out playoff games must have been as chilling to the NFL as the game-time temperatures will be Sunday to those shivering at Lambeau Field in Green Bay.

Green Bay, Indianapolis and Cincinnati received extensions beyond the usual 72-hour window in an effort to sell thousands of tickets for their home playoff games — an uncommon occurrence given no playoff game has been blacked out since 2002. By late Friday afternoon, all three cities sold out, albeit with the help of large supermarket chain purchases in Cincinnati and Indy and a banking chain's buy in Green Bay.

For the NFL, the embarrassment wouldn't have been just empty seats inside stadiums for important games. Blacking out even a single large TV market — especially Milwaukee, where the Packers game is expected to draw 1 million viewers — would have adversely affected network TV ratings, and ratings determine the how much networks can charge for ads.

There are numerous theories why the games took so long to sell out, the most common being that fans en masse are trading $160 game tickets for their 60-inch HDTVs. The games are so good in high definition, with multiple replays that aren't seen in stadiums, that it's tempting to give up the stadium experience (and the high-priced parking and drunken fans three seats away) for the family-room sofa.

In reality, there are myriad reasons, and not just ticket prices. Cincinnati ($86 and $96) and Indianapolis ($63), for example, sold tickets priced less than those for many concert acts.

In Green Bay, the threat of intolerable cold no doubt discouraged potential ticket buyers. With a predicted game-time temperature below zero and a possible wind chill of minus-20, it could be the third-coldest game in NFL history to the minus-13 for the Ice Bowl (the 1967 Cowboys-Packers NFC title game) and the minus-9 Freezer Bowl (the Chargers-Bengals 1981 season AFC title game).

But Packers management also deserves blame. It forced season-ticket holders to purchase seats for both potential Lambeau Field playoff games in advance — and at a time when Aaron Rodgers' injury made the Packers' participation doubtful.

A Packers fan whose two season tickets cost $880 said it would have cost him more than $1,100 after ticket-buying fees just to keep those seats for the playoffs. And the money would not have been refunded if there were no home playoff games but, rather, applied to 2014 seat costs.

That policy, even more than the weather, is being cited for 40,000 seats for a Packers playoff game suddenly becoming available.

The unpredictability of the NFL regular season also is an issue. The Packers and Bengals didn't know until last Sunday that they would host playoff games. The Packers won a win-or-out game in Chicago to get in. The Bengals still had a chance for a wild-card weekend bye until the Patriots won. This is an important factor in a market like Cincinnati, which draws fans from a relatively large region.

The NFL loves parity and down-to-the-wire playoff finishes, yet those all-important Week 17 games leave precious little time to sell tickets for a game being played in mere days.

But certainly the proliferation of big-screen HDTV sets played a role, too. Consider: Walmart sold an estimated 2 million HDTVs on Black Friday — and all those sets aren't being used just for gaming and watching “CSI” or “The Voice.”

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.