Share This Page

Steelers hire Saxon as running backs coach

| Tuesday, Jan. 28, 2014, 4:15 p.m.

The Steelers and Vikings apparently are trading running backs coaches.

James Saxon, let go by the Vikings after three seasons after a head coaching change, is the new Steelers running backs coach, the team announced Tuesday. He replaces Kirby Wilson, who was allowed to leave the team with one season remaining on his contract and is expected to be hired to coach the Vikings' running backs.

The Steelers needed only three days to replace Wilson, who interviewed twice to become the Baltimore Ravens' offensive coordinator but was not hired. Wilson was part of Mike Tomlin's original Steelers coaching staff in 2007 before leaving the team Saturday.

Saxon, who coached star running back Adrian Peterson in Minnesota, will be starting his 23rd NFL season as a player or coach. He previously coached the running backs for the Dolphins (2008-10), Chiefs (2001-07) and Bills (2000).

Saxon wasn't retained when Mike Zimmer was hired to replace Leslie Frazier as the Vikings' coach.

The Steelers also announced the signing of wide receiver Danny Coale, a fifth-round draft choice by Dallas in 2012, to a reserve-future contract. The former Virginia Tech player split time last season on the practice squads of the Cowboys and Colts.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at arobinson@tribweb.com or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.