ShareThis Page

Rooney: No further punishment related to Tomlin sideline incident

| Thursday, March 20, 2014, 3:21 p.m.
The Ravens' Jacoby Jones returns a kick down the Steelers sideline as Steelers coach Mike Tomlin moves off the field during the third quarter Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013 at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Ravens' Jacoby Jones returns a kick down the Steelers sideline as Steelers coach Mike Tomlin moves off the field during the third quarter Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013 at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore.

Maybe the NFL believes the Steelers already were punished enough.

The Steelers won't lose a draft pick for coach Mike Tomlin's sideline two-step during Ravens returner Jacoby Jones' 73-yard kickoff return in Baltimore last season, team president Art Rooney II said Thursday.

“We are glad that's behind us,” Rooney said.

Tomlin drew a $100,000 fine, matching the second-largest for a coach in league history, for turning his back to the play, edging onto the field and nearly colliding with Jones, who complained of being forced to change direction. The Ravens went on to win, 22-20 on Nov. 28.

Former NFL vice president of football operations Ray Anderson later said the Steelers also faced the possible loss of a draft pick or some other draft-related penalty. The Steelers would have formally appealed any such penalty.

Now, they can continue preparing for a draft in which they will have six picks plus two conditional picks — likely, a third and a fifth — that are expected to be awarded at next week's league meetings in Orlando. In advance of the draft, Tomlin and general manager Kevin Colbert attended Notre Dame's pro day Thursday.

While it might not have been a factor in the league's decision to not take away a pick, the Steelers missed the playoffs in part because of a blown officiating call during the Chiefs-Chargers game on the final day of the regular season.

They would have made the postseason if the field included 14 teams, not just the current 12 — an expansion that could take place as early as 2015. Rooney said the issue will be discussed in Orlando.

The Steelers are in favor as long as the playoff field is not reseeded and division champions continue to have home-field advantage during the divisional round.

“We would not be in favor of anything that changes the division situation,” he said.

On other league topics, Rooney said:

• The replay system could be tweaked to allow referees to communicate with the league office during replay reviews.

“Frankly, I think that happens anyway,” he said. “In terms of anything more ambitious than that, I think it's going to be studied.”

Other proposed changes include allowing a coach to challenge any call.

• He isn't sure if penalizing teams for on-field racial slurs is the best way to address the issue.

“I think it's a little bit of a generation gap kind of thing,” Rooney said. “I think the younger players have a different attitude toward it and you can't change that with just a 15-yard penalty.”

• He doesn't see any consensus toward moving the ball back to the 20- or 25-yard line on an extra point or for altering the goal posts. He likes Tomlin's idea to run all extra point plays from the 1-yard line, but it was not formally proposed by the Steelers.

“It certainly would encourage people to go for the two,” Rooney said.

• There are NFL teams “interested” in the Los Angeles and London markets, and, “It may not be too much longer before there is some action on those fronts.”

• He doesn't favor increasing the active roster from 46 to 49 for Thursday games, which often are a team's second game in five days.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.