Outside deeper than inside at linebacker in NFL Draft
By Alan Robinson| Monday, April 28, 2014, 10:12 p.m.
During a simpler time in baseball, pitchers were starters or relievers. There weren't eight-inning specialists or closers or left-handers called on to retire a single left-handed batter.
It's that way in football now, especially at linebacker. An NFL team doesn't look just for an inside or outside linebacker any longer — it's far more specialized than that. Now, a linebacker might defend the slot receiver, cover a tight end, rush the quarterback or be asked drop a 250-pound running back.
So a team looking for an edge rusher won't take a second look at a linebacker who is effective against the run but lacks the requisite size and speed to match up at the line of scrimmage against tight ends or tackles. Rather, the kind of linebacker every team is looking for is a do-it-all type who is big, fast and strong, capable of pass rushing from the strong side or lining up as a prototypical defensive end.
The player who best fits this description in the 2014 draft class is Khalil Mack, a 6-foot-3, 251-pound outside linebacker from, of all places, Buffalo. Mack might have played in the MAC, but he had some of his best career games against schools such as Ohio State and Baylor.
“It's going to be a transition, but I feel like football-wise I'm ready to step in and make an impact any way I can,” Mack said.
The Steelers need help both inside and outside now that Larry Foote and LaMarr Woodley are gone but, despite the overall depth of this draft class, the inside linebacker group is thin and the outside linebacker talent is crowded at the top.
“The draft is deeper at the corner position than it is at outside linebacker,” NFL Network analyst Charles Davis said. “If there's someone big that you want at 'backer, you may want to go ahead and get him now.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.