Share This Page

Steelers agree to terms with 2 draft picks

| Monday, May 19, 2014, 10:51 a.m.

The Steelers have agreed to terms with a pair of draft picks.

Sixth-round selection nose tackle Daniel McCullers (Tennessee) and seventh-round pick tight end Rob Branchflower (Massachusetts) became the first of the Steelers' nine draft picks to sign their rookie contracts on Monday.

The deals, however, won't be official for another two weeks when the Steelers will gain around $8 million in cap space because of the June 1 designation of LaMarr Woodley's release in March. According to the NFLPA, the Steelers are only $293,437 under the NFL's $133 million salary cap.

With the slotting of draft picks determining rookie salaries, Blanchflower's deal is worth approximately $2.279 million for four years with a $59,000 signing bonus. McCullers' deal is worth slightly more as he will earn $2.298 million over four years with a signing bonus of $78,000.

McCullers (6-7, 352), who was the 215th overall pick, started 19 of 22 games and recorded 72 tackles (41 solo) in his two years at Tennessee while Blanchflower (6-4, 256), who was the 230th overall selection, started 27 of 38 games, recording 109 receptions for 1,164 yards and nine touchdowns.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at mkaboly@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.