ShareThis Page

Steelers receiver Justin Brown continues to progress in workouts

| Sunday, June 15, 2014, 9:24 p.m.

Antonio Brown was a sixth-round draft selection by the Steelers, just like Justin Brown.

Antonio Brown had established veterans ahead of him on the depth chart heading into his second season, just like Justin Brown does this year.

However, there is one glaring difference between the two — Antonio Brown, who went on to surpass 1,000 yards receiving by his second season — never got the opportunity Justin Brown is getting this spring.

“No, no, not this early on,” Antonio Brown said.

The Steelers took a good look at Justin Brown during the recently completed three weeks of spring practices by giving him first-team reps alongside Antonio Brown and Lance Moore before ramping up the frequency with the top unit by the end of the sessions. He's worked at all three positions with the first-team reps coming in three receiver sets.

Heading into the final stretch of offseason workouts cumulating with a three-day minicamp starting Tuesday, it could be much of the same for the 6-foot-3 receiver who spent all 17 weeks of his rookie season last year on the practice squad.

“It is definitely good getting some reps with the ones,” Brown said. “When my number is called, I am just trying make sure that I ready and I know what I am doing. I've noticed (the Steelers taking a long look at him), and it's definitely encouraging.”

No one expects Justin Brown to have a jump from obscurity to a 1,000-yard season in a year like Antonio Brown, but the Steelers want to see if he's capable. There is a need at the position after losing 113 catches and 16 touchdowns from a year ago when the defections of free agents Emmanuel Sanders and Jerricho Cotchery.

“I feel like I have been trying to better my game,” Brown said. “I am trying to go hard every day and show the coaches that I have been working hard. But as I said, I still have a ways to go.”

The Steelers brought in two free agent receivers (Moore, Darrius Heyward-Bey); three receivers who were in another camp last year (Danny Coale, Lanear Simpson, Kashif Moore); drafted one in the fourth round (Martavis Bryant); and added a rookie the second week of OTAs (C.J. Goodwin) in the hopes of finding someone who could fill out the position.

Derek Moye and Markus Wheaton are holdovers from last year, but they have a combined eight catches between them. The Steelers would like to see Wheaton, a third-round pick last year, assert himself, but the speedy receiver was slowed by a finger injury last year and has been kept out of team drills at times this spring, thus giving Brown an unexpected opportunity.

“Justin is doing some great things,” quarterback Ben Roethlisberger said. “I just like that he keeps working to get better and every day you see improvement from him.”

Brown made plenty of plays after transferring from Penn State to Oklahoma for his senior year amid the Jerry Sandusky scandal.

Brown equaled the amount of catches he had at Oklahoma in one year (73) and nearly doubled the touchdowns catches (five) compared to what he had all three years at Penn State.

Brown finished with 879 yards — eighth in the nation — his only year at Oklahoma with Landry Jones, now a backup with the Steelers, as his quarterback.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.