Share This Page

Steelers WR Wheaton wants to produce after injury-plagued rookie year

| Sunday, July 27, 2014, 9:30 p.m.

They could have brought in a more high-profile free agent.

They could have drafted a wide receiver higher than at No. 118.

If the Steelers are concerned that Markus Wheaton isn't ready to make the leap from a nondescript, injury-plagued rookie year to replacing at least a portion of free-agent defectors Emmanuel Sanders' and Jerricho Cotchery's combined 113 catches and 16 touchdowns, they didn't proceed that way in the offseason.

In fact, they gave Wheaton a vote of confidence by doing what they did with their wide receiver crew in the offseason, which was not much at all.

“Now, he has got to be the man,” Steelers receiver coach Richard Mann said. “Somebody has to pick up that slack. The good thing about him is that he doesn't need a lot of reps. It doesn't take him long to get it.”

“I consider myself a quick learner, and I have been like that for a while,” Wheaton said.

That's good, because the Steelers don't have much time to piece together a wide receiver group for Ben Roethlisberger and his sometimes pass-happy offense.

Antonio Brown returns after having a career year with 110 catches and 1,499 yards, but the rest of the unit, minus free agent additions Lance Moore and Darrius Heyward-Bey, combined for eight receptions. Wheaton had six of those.

The onus will be on Wheaton, the Steelers' third-round pick in 2013, to step into the starting role opposite of Brown.

“The expectation level is high,” Roethlisberger said. “He was doing some really good things last year until he got hurt. He kind of lost some confidence I think in himself, but he's got it back and I'm just excited for him to take that next step in Year 2.”

Year 1 got off to a rousing start for Wheaton.

Despite missing all of spring practices because his class at Oregon State had yet to graduate, Wheaton showed up to training camp and was an instant sensation.

“Last year I was thinking a lot and didn't know if I was over-thinking things or just trying to get something down,” Wheaton said. “When you are thinking like that, you can't play at the speed you want to play.”

Wheaton played sparingly through the first three weeks before taking part in 36 snaps in a Week 4 game against Minnesota. One of those plays — he doesn't remember which one — Wheaton broke his right pinky finger in three places. It was an injury that proved to be troublesome.

Wheaton didn't get back on the field until Week 11 against the Detroit Lions, but the finger continued to be an issue. He didn't have a catch from Weeks 12-17, and he needed to have additional postseason surgery.

“He came back and played and was still adequate,” Mann said. “With that said, that tells me something about him. Basically, I need him to pick up where he left off last year.”

Wheaton acknowledges the pressure that comes with the expectations and welcomes it.

“I feel like I feed off the pressure and embrace it,” Wheaton said. “I don't want to be just another guy in the locker room. I don't want to be just another name that passes through the program.”

Wheaton will get every opportunity to prove he's not one of those guys.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.