Steelers notebook: Team hasn't called on Keisel, Harrison yet
• The Steelers haven't made any move to bring back longtime defensive starters Brett Keisel and James Harrison, who are unsigned. But general manager Kevin Colbert said, “We haven't eliminated any players from consideration. You never know what might happen in the preseason and into the season.”
• Shamarko Thomas might not start — at least if Troy Polamalu and Mike Mitchell stay healthy — so cornerback Ike Taylor kiddingly suggests the second-year safety might fit in elsewhere on defense. “You talk about a guy 220 (pounds), running a 4.3 (40) with 6 percent body fat and doesn't mind hitting and being hit. His offseason workouts are unbelievable. He doesn't work out with the DBs, he works out with the linebackers. That's how strong Shamarko is.”
• The players' union (NFLPA) estimates the Steelers are about $6 million below the salary cap, but Colbert said it's not that much. He said they benefited from the •$10 million cap bump to $130 million this year. “It allowed us to be more aggressive in free agency and maybe less aggressive on some of the things we were going to have to do to get in (cap) compliance,” Colbert said.
• Rookie linebacker Jordan Zumwalt was bothered Monday by a tight groin. Running back Le'Veon Bell (hamstring) and wide receiver C.J. Goodwin (shoulder) sat out and remain day to day. Safety Mitchell (groin) and running back Alvester Alexander (groin) did running drills with the training staff.
Tuesday: Players day off; campus closed to public
Wednesday: 3 p.m.
Thursday: 3 p.m.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.