Steelers quizzed on no-huddle offense
Ben Roethlisberger is invested heavily in the Steelers' no-huddle offense. But it's his teammates who will end up paying if it's not run correctly.
With the no-huddle expected to be a key element of Todd Haley's offense, Roethlisberger is quizzing running backs, wide receivers and tight ends each week on their responsibilities.
“We give them a five hand-signal pop quiz,” he said Monday. “They have to write down what play is called and the role they have. We keep a tally on who has the most misses. They (who miss the most) owe pizza and wings to the whole offense when it's done.”
Given how much the Steelers can eat, that could be a big investment. But Roethlisberger said the quiz is a way of keeping everybody sharp in a system that produced two early touchdowns Saturday against the Buffalo Bills.
“Even those little things (like a quiz), I've been challenging people because I feel comfortable doing it, (and) because I know we are going to do it this year,” he said. “I want guys to be up to speed on it.”
Roethlisberger liked how efficient the no-huddle was Saturday — “I thought there was only one mistake, and it was a minor one,” he said — and he is eager to see how effective it will be Thursday night in Philadelphia.
“I'd like to get a little more road work,” Roethlisberger said. “That's usually the good part about trying to get at least one series of no-huddle on the road because the communication is a little tougher.”
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.