Steelers re-sign Keisel to bolster depth on defensive line
The Steelers, who spent most of the past two years shedding players from their recent Super Bowl past, are bringing back defensive end Brett Keisel for one more season.
Keisel, who played on the 2005 and 2008 Super Bowl-winning teams, was re-signed Tuesday to add a veteran presence and depth to a relatively inexperienced defensive line. The 12-year veteran has 29 sacks, including one in each of the final two games last season.
Keisel, a free agent, reportedly turned down a chance to visit Tuesday with the Arizona Cardinals because he didn't want to leave his family behind in Pittsburgh during the season. He then returned to the Steelers, who had previously offered him a veteran's minimum contract.
“I'm very excited to finish what I started in 2002 with the Steelers. Time to get to work!” Keisel posted in a Twitter message.
According to teammate Cam Heyward, Keisel, who turns 36 next month, has been working out and preparing to play in case he reached terms with a team.
The Steelers went through training camp with Heyward at left defensive end, Steve McLendon at nose tackle and rookie Stephon Tuitt splitting time with former Chargers lineman Cam Thomas at right defensive end. During the Bills preseason game Saturday, McLendon and Thomas played in the base defense but Tuitt played in sub package downs, mostly in the dime defense.
“We plan on continuing to rotate those guys but not in any pre-prescribed rotation,” coach Mike Tomlin said.
Rookies Josh Mauro (two sacks vs. Bills) and Daniel McCullers also have been rotating in, along with 2013 draft pick Nick Williams and former practice squad member Brian Arnfelt. It is unlikely Keisel will play Thursday in Philadelphia because he hasn't practiced.
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.