Share This Page

Steelers formalize practice squad

| Sunday, Aug. 31, 2014, 6:15 p.m.

Offensive lineman Alejandro Villanueva, a former West Point wide receiver who served in Afghanistan as an Army Ranger, is one of 10 players on the Steelers' season-opening 10-man practice squad.

The 6-foot-9 Villanueva, who was in the Eagles' camp as a defensive lineman before working out last week in Pittsburgh, is the only practice squad player who wasn't in the Steelers' training camp.

Also added Sunday were Howard Jones, the former Division II Shepherd University player who recovered three fumbles in the preseason; cornerback Shaquille Richardson, safety Ross Ventrone, defensive linemen Josh Mauro and Nick Williams, running back Josh Harris, wide receivers Derek Moye and C.J. Goodwin and tight end Rob Blanchflower.

Richardson and Blanchflower were May draft picks who were cut Saturday as the Steelers reduced their roster to 53. Williams was a 2013 draft pick. Moye, a former Penn State player, made one touchdown catch among his two receptions in eight games last season.

Villanueva, who now weighs 277 pounds, served three tours as an Army Ranger captain in Afghanistan, earning the bronze star for valor. He last played football in 2009, when he was Army's leading wide receiver, catching 34 passes for 525 yards and five touchdowns. He was one of the Eagles' early cuts in camp after signing with them out of a tryout camp last spring.

Villanueva was recruited by Army as a tight end, but also played the offensive and defensive line before spending his final season primarily as a receiver.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.