ShareThis Page

Steelers notebook: Roethlisberger injures hand against Saints

| Sunday, Nov. 30, 2014, 8:09 p.m.

Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger banged his hand on Saints linebacker Curtis Lofton during the first quarter of Sunday's 35-32 loss.

Even though Roethlisberger did not come out of the game, he was flexing his hand and indicated to the sidelines immediately after to run the ball.

The injury happened when Roethlisberger connected with Antonio Brown on a 21-yard pass on third-and-8 in the first quarter. On the next five plays, Roethlisberger handed off. Before throwing the final play of the quarter, Roethlisberger ran over to the sidelines and tossed a pass to backup Bruce Gradkowski.

“I am sure every quarterback has that happen every game,” Roethlisberger said. “Does it hurt? Yeah. Did it affect my throwing? No.”

Bell hits milestone

Le'Veon Bell went over 1,000 yards and became only the fifth player in Steelers history to go over 1,500 all-purpose yards.

“It's a very individual accomplishment,” Bell said. “It is not something a lot of people can do.”

Bell finished with 254 all-purpose yards against the Saints — 95 yards rushing and 159 receiving. Bell has 1,046 yards rushing and 65 receptions for 643 yards.

Rough return

In his first game back since Week 3, Ike Taylor gave up a 69-yard touchdown pass to Kenny Stills in the third quarter on a double move.

“Your eyes can be your friend or your worst enemy,” Taylor said. “So when your eyes aren't where they need to be, just for that split-second, that's what happens.”

Running wild

The Saints rushed for 143 yards for a 5.5 yards-per-carry average with only 9 of those yards in the first quarter. Mark Ingram rushed for 122 yards. It was only the third 100-yard rusher the Steelers have allowed this year — Terrance West and Arian Foster.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.