ShareThis Page

Steelers' Polamalu ponders murky future after team's playoff loss

| Sunday, Jan. 4, 2015, 10:03 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Steelers defensive coordinator Dick Lebeau and safety Troy Polamalu (43) leave the field after the Steelers lost to the Ravens, 30-17, in an AFC wild card game Saturday, Jan. 3, 2015, at Heinz Field.

Troy Polamalu made a long, arduous walk toward his locker more than an hour after the Steelers were ousted from the postseason by Baltimore in Saturday night's wild-card game, which was decided, in part, by penalties and momentum-crushing turnovers.

The outcome, a 30-17 defeat at Heinz Field, hinged greatly on the absence of the team's young star, All-Pro running back Le'Veon Bell. The heavy lifting shifted to quarterback Ben Roethlisberger and a defense that relied on Polamalu's presence to generate a spark.

A distant look in Polamalu's eyes was reflective of a proud 12-year veteran disappointed in his effort. He, too, looked weary and tired as he punted on most questions about the possibility of retirement, saying repeatedly, “Time will tell.”

As time ran out on the Steelers' first playoff appearance in three seasons, it may no longer be an ally of the future Hall of Famer.

“Honestly, we just lost a game,” said Polamalu, who has two years remaining on his contract. “I don't think I'm prepared to even think about that or talk about that at this time.”

Polamalu, who turns 34 in April, led a sometimes-undisciplined defense with eight tackles. However, he hardly impacted the game as he did in the Steelers' playoff wins over Baltimore in 2008 and 2010.

He didn't deliver a familiar splash play. Or a thunderous hit to create a seismic shift in momentum.

“I didn't play good enough to win the game,” said Polamalu, who sat out four of the past seven regular-season games with injuries.

Instead, a restless crowd watched as Baltimore's defense played better than it had all season. The Ravens thwarted the Steelers' comeback effort as they twice intercepted Roethlisberger in the fourth quarter.

This time, Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs made the plays that often defined Polamalu's career. He made a spectacular interception that led to a fourth-quarter touchdown, and he consistently collapsed the pocket to help generate five sacks.

The Ravens' first playoff victory in Pittsburgh left plenty of doubt about the future of several veteran players, including linebackers James Harrison and Jason Worilds and cornerback Ike Taylor, but mostly Polamalu.

“You'll never know how much these guys sacrificed,” defensive end Cam Heyward said. “You just don't know what's going to happen in the future.”

Polamalu appeared to tip his hand as he reminisced about the glory years, which included Super Bowl victories in the 2005 and 2008 seasons. He spoke passionately of former teammates Hines Ward, Joey Porter, Marvel Smith and Alan Faneca — players who define the organization.

“They laid it all on the line,” Polamalu said. “They played hard every snap.”

Polamalu said it's fair to suggest his future, with the Steelers is in doubt. Yet, he didn't rule out the possibility of returning in 2015 to play with an increasingly younger team.

“There is a lot of young talent all over the field,” said Polamalu, the 2010 NFL Defensive Player of the Year. “This team really grew throughout the season, not just in the secondary.

“Sometimes you have to pay your dues. The Super Bowl teams I was a part of, it wasn't the first time we made the playoffs we won the Super Bowl. We went to the (2004) AFC championship game and lost, and our team grew from that and the next year (2005), we won a Super Bowl.

“When you've been part of an organization as long as I've been, you learn it's not a one-year process,” he added. “There are growing pains, and seeing people develop was a great accomplishment. Of course, we wanted more out of (this season), but the team will learn from it, I'm sure.”

Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.