Steelers' Mitchell says he's not making 'story' about groin injury
Steelers safety Mike Mitchell stands with coach Mike Tomlin on the side line during a game against the Jets Sunday, Nov. 9, 2014, at MetLife Stadium.
Photo by Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Mike Mitchell didn't have as good of a first season with the Steelers as he wanted, but he also had a pretty good reason why — a torn groin.
Mitchell injured his groin before the start of training camp but played through it.
Mitchell started all 17 games, including the playoff loss to Baltimore on Saturday. He will have surgery on his groin later in the week.
“If you have to get it surgically repaired, it's pretty (bad),” Mitchell said. “I am not trying to make this a story. Sometimes I have to be able to talk to you like human beings.”
Mitchell, who signed a five-year, $25 million free agent contract in March to be paired with Troy Polamalu, had an uneven season. He was second on the team with 70 tackles and first with two forced fumbles but also allowed a handful of passes get behind him, and he had two helmet-to-helmet penalties called on him.
Mitchell originally injured his groin during offseason workouts leading up to the start of training camp. He didn't offer any details on how he got hurt other than that it happened while he was preparing for camp.
“That's why I missed the beginning of camp,” Mitchell said.
Mitchell spent 10 days on the physically unable to perform list before being activated Aug. 4.
Mitchell didn't sit out practice until a span midway through the year when he was held out of a Wednesday practice for five consecutive weeks. The Steelers said his absence was non-injury related.
Mitchell sat out a Week 16 Wednesday practice leading up the Chiefs game because of a sore groin.
Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.