Share This Page

Agent: Polamalu undecided whether to play in 2015

| Wednesday, March 4, 2015, 7:39 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Steelers safety Troy Polamalu is weighing retirement versus returning in 2015.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers safety Troy Polamalu is weighing retirement versus returning in 2015.

Troy Polamalu might not be with the Steelers very much longer, but that doesn't mean he's done with football.

Right now, he just isn't sure.

Amid reports of the Steelers wanting the veteran All-Pro safety to retire instead of the team being forced to release him, Polamalu still could play in the upcoming season, his agent, Marvin Demoff, said.

“Troy is still determining whether he wants to retire or try and play in 2015,” Demoff told Trib Total Media. “We will make a decision fairly soon, but (it is) not imminent.”

Polamalu will turn 34 in April, and the Steelers would like to get out from under his $8.25 million cap number this year. If the Steelers release him with a post-June 1 designation, it would save the team $6 million off the salary cap.

If Polamalu decides to retire, Steelers could fight to regain a prorated portion of Polamalu's signing bonus of $6.75 million ($4.5 million of which they could recover).

Teams cannot release a player with a post-June 1 designation until the start of the new league year, which is March 10.

Polamalu, a five-time first-team All-Pro member, eight-time Pro Bowler and AP Defensive Player of the Year in 2010, was the Steelers' first-round pick in 2003.

Shamarko Thomas would be first in line to take over for Polamalu at strong safety.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at mkaboly@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.