Share This Page

Steelers' Brown, DeCastro named AP All-Pro 1st team

| Friday, Jan. 8, 2016, 1:45 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers Antonio Brown during practice Thursday, Jan. 7, 2016 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Steelers guard David DeCastro was selected to the 2015 Pro Bowl.

For the second consecutive season, the Steelers offense has been recognized with multiple first-team All-Pros.

Receiver Antonio Brown and guard David DeCastro were named to the Associated Press All-Pro team Friday, making the Steelers one of two teams with at least two All-Pros on offense.

Brown, whose 136 catches tied Julio Jones this season for the second most in NFL history, was honored for the second consecutive year. He was named on 49 of the 50 ballots, just missing on joining Adrian Peterson and J.J. Watt as unanimous choices.

“It's a tremendous honor,” Brown said. “I'm always extremely grateful and humbled by the opportunity, and I just want to continue to build on it.”

DeCastro was named to his first Pro Bowl last month.

Last season, Brown, Bell and center Maurkice Pouncey were first-team AP All-Pros. Bell and Pouncey are on injured reserve this season.

“When we get all our guys back, Pouncey and Le'Veon, I think we've got the makings of an All-Pro offense,” Brown said, “with all our All-Pro individuals, including, obviously, our quarterback (Ben Roethlisberger).”

Roethlisberger was named to his fourth Pro Bowl last month.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.