Share This Page

Steelers-Bengals fines total more than $83K

| Friday, Jan. 15, 2016, 4:09 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers assistant coach Joey Porter (right) is surrounded by Bengals defenders, as Steelers receiver Antonio Brown is taken from the field during the fourth quarter of the AFC Wild Card game Saturday, Jan. 9, 2016, in Cincinnati.

The tally is in from the NFL: Last week's Steelers-Bengals wild-card playoff game resulted in a total of six fines to six players and coaches for $83,665.

That's in addition to the three-game suspension levied on Cincinnati linebacker Vontaze Burfict that was announced earlier this week.

The league Friday confirmed fines to three Bengals players and three members of the Steelers organization for actions during last Saturday's meeting between the AFC North rivals.

Steelers guard Ramon Foster was docked $17,363, and coaches Joey Porter and Mike Munchak received $10,000 fines.

Porter, the team's outside linebackers coach, went on the field and interacted with Bengals players after Antonio Brown was injured during the game's final minute.

Late in the first quarter, Munchak grabbed Cincinnati safety Reggie Nelson when Nelson ran out of bounds while pursuing Steelers runner Jordan Todman late in the first quarter. Foster was flagged for a “leg whip.”

Bengals fines were handed out to cornerback Adam “Pacman” Jones ($28,940) and defensive linemen Domata Peko and Wallace Gilberry ($8,681 each).

Jones' fine was for unsportsmanlike conduct. He made contact with an official when he appeared to be attempting to engage Porter after Gilberry had bumped Porter.

Peko ran onto the field — from the sideline and wearing a raincoat — during the second quarter to shove Steelers running back Fitzgerald Toussaint in the back.

When the Steelers and Bengals met last month, the NFL levied 10 fines to eight players totaling $147,587, including almost $70,000 to Burfict for three incidents in the Steelers' victory.

Burfict's suspension announced Monday was for “repeated violations of safety-related playing rules,” according to the league. The most recent one was the use of his shoulder to make forcible contact to the head and neck of a defenseless Brown with 22 seconds to play.

The hit caused a concussion that will prevent Brown from playing in the divisional round game Sunday at Denver. It also sparked the on-field chaos that resulted in the fines to Porter, Gilberry and Jones.

Burfict also had the sack of Ben Roethlisberger, in which he suffered an injured shoulder that has him listed as questionable for Sunday's game. Replays appear to show Burfict intentionally driving into Roethlisberger's shoulder after the play.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.