Share This Page

Analysis: Butler, Steelers defense should improve next season

| Saturday, Jan. 23, 2016, 9:48 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Keith Butler improved the Steelers defense, which increased its sacks and takeaways in his first season as coordinator.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers defensive coordinator Keith Butler during the AFC Wild Card game against the Bengals Sunday, Jan. 9, 2015 at Paul Brown Stadium.

Steelers coach Mike Tomlin was impressed with defensive coordinator Keith Butler's work this season.

We learned that Wednesday during Tomlin's season-ending news conference when he said, “I was impressed with his work.”

Actually, Tomlin should be (and maybe he is) extremely impressed with Butler's work, because it was, well, impressive.

Butler took over for the lovable and successful Dick LeBeau a year ago in a somewhat uncomfortable way, and he exceeded expectations.

Butler's contract was up. LeBeau's contract was up. Tomlin felt it was time to politely ask LeBeau to step aside. When LeBeau didn't, the Steelers issued one of those infamous press releases in which they try to describe why a coordinator is no longer employed.

It was absolutely the right decision by Tomlin.

The defense — not the offense — was the reason the Steelers advanced to within three minutes of the AFC championship game.

Everything that once ailed the unit seemingly was fixed in one season.

Sacks went from 33 to 48. Turnovers went from 21 to 30. Points allowed dropped almost four per game.

Remember the preseason narrative of needing to score 30 points per game to have a chance to win? The Steelers allowed more than 28 points only twice all season.

The total defense ranking went from 18th to 21st, but that is inconsequential considering the Steelers led the NFL in red-zone turnovers and recorded the third most sacks.

Bottom line: The Steelers defense was much better, and nobody saw that coming — at least not this quickly.

“I think he did a great job, man,” cornerback Antwon Blake said. “Coming in and taking over for LeBeau, that takes a lot. That's a lot of pressure. I thought he did a great job with game plans this year, and we just got to execute them.”

What Butler wanted to do, however, he couldn't. And that's the main reason to be “impressed” by his work.

Butler entered the season with a plan of how he wanted to run the defense.

Basically only one thing went as planned.

Butler wanted to unleash his talented defensive ends to pressure quarterbacks, and that's what Cam Heyward and Stephon Tuitt did.

Otherwise, Butler changed on the fly.

He wanted to play more zone defense, especially Cover 2. Although it was part of the game plan, it wasn't used much. Instead, Butler spent much of the season devising plans to hide an underachieving secondary.

Where else has half of a starting secondary been benched only days before the opener? But that's what happened when Butler benched Shamarko Thomas and Cortez Allen. It turned out to be the right call.

Where else has a team signed another team's castoff like the Steelers did with Ross Cockrell — who didn't survive the first round of cuts with the Buffalo Bills — and make him a big part of the secondary? Or use a 32-year-old free safety like Will Allen?

The Steelers did both.

“I think anybody that's an architect of football schematics, you have what you want to do, a vision of what you want to do, and then you have the reality,” Tomlin said. “And the reality is usually associated with the abilities of the players that you have the amount of time, or your ability, to teach and the way that your opponent stresses you.”

Still, Butler each week was successful in mixing and matching players, schemes and concepts into what was best for the team.

Just think what Butler could have accomplished with stability in the secondary and depth on the defensive line.

“We surprised a lot of people. We surprised ourselves in some ways,” Blake said. “As the season continued to progress, we came together more and meshed together more as a unit, and you could say our level of play increased and we started making more plays.”

A lot of that was thanks to Butler.

Cornerback William Gay will tell you there wasn't much difference between Butler and LeBeau, or as he put it: “You get a different little sauce or taste, but the main course is still the same. It's the same spaghetti. You probably like your spaghetti way different than he does. At the end of the day, it's still spaghetti.”

Butler's dish just happened to be a bit more appetizing.

He made in-game adjustments. He blitzed just about anybody and everybody. He thought outside the box.

Just think what Butler's defense can do when he has the people to do it with.

That will even be more impressive.

Mark Kaboly is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at mkaboly@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.