ShareThis Page

Pitt men's basketball team trying to reverse trend of slow starts

| Wednesday, Jan. 20, 2016, 9:21 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
North Carolina State's Abdul-Malki Abu dunks against Pitt in the second half Tuesday, Jan. 19, 2016, at Petersen Events Center.

In an impressive wire-to-wire victory at Notre Dame, Pitt jumped out to a 13-0 lead and never looked back.

The Panthers were aggressive and locked in at both ends of the court. Their fast start provided just enough of a cushion to hold off a late Notre Dame rally.

Since that game, however, the Panthers have been slow out of the starting gate, bracketing losses to No. 17 Louisville and N.C. State around a win over Boston College.

The Panthers understand they can ill afford another slow start at Florida State on Saturday in the first of two consecutive ACC road games.

“It starts with pregame,” junior Jamel Artis said. “Don't come out lackadaisical and don't overlook any team.”

That may have been the case in a 78-61 loss to visiting N.C. State, a talented, yet underachieving opponent that entered the contest 0-5 in the ACC.

Pitt has lost four consecutive games to N.C. State, but the Panthers said they didn't open Tuesday's game with the necessary level of urgency.

“We've got to come out and hit them in the first five minutes,” Artis said. “I don't think we overlooked them. We just came out very slow.”

It has become a familiar, unsettling pattern for the Panthers (15-3, 4-2), who lost two of their past three games by an average of 17.5 points.

Following the 86-82 win at Notre Dame on Jan. 9, the Panthers fell behind early in each of their next three games.

They trailed Louisville, 20-17, at intermission, fell behind Boston College, 10-2, and, in their most recent game, were outscored 25-6 in the opening 10 minutes and trailed 44-19 at halftime.

“You can't put yourself in the situation being down 25,” coach Jamie Dixon said. “That set the tone and made it really almost an impossibility to come back.”

Against Boston College, arguably the worst team in the ACC, the Panthers regrouped and took control.

It was more difficult for the Panthers to overcome slow starts against Louisville and N.C. State, teams with imposing frontlines and more talented rosters.

Trailing N.C. State by as many as 28 points in the first half, the Panthers sliced the deficit down to 68-57 with 1 minute 22 seconds remaining.

“The ACC is tough. You definitely can lose on any given night,” said junior Michael Young, who leads the Panthers in scoring. “That's what the ACC is about. You've got to come out ready, no matter who the opponent is.

“We've got to play hard the first five minutes.”

John Harris is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @jharris_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.