Kicker Suisham intends to play for Steelers in 2016
During a speech to fellow newly-naturalized U.S. citizens Wednesday, Shaun Suisham noted he had been part of “in excess of 20” transactions over more than a decade in the NFL.
The Steelers kicker doesn't intend to be subjected to another in 2016.
“I have zero interest in giving my job away,” Suisham said Wednesday at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services field office in Wilkins.
Suisham still hasn't been cleared to kick as he recovers from a torn ACL and meniscus in his left knee suffered during the preseason opener. In the interim, Chris Boswell — the Steelers' third try in finding a replacement for Suisham — impressed in 14 games (including playoffs) with the team.
Boswell made 29 of 32 field goals (coincidentally, Suisham went 29 for 32 in 2014), and being that he is nine years younger and is scheduled to make almost $2 million less than Suisham this season, he might have an advantage in the race for the gig in 2016.
But what does Suisham think?
“The first thing I need to do is get healthy — if I'm healthy, I think I will be in good position to get my old job back,” he said.
The Canadian-born Suisham repeatedly said he “loves” Pittsburgh and that he and his family consider it “home.” He has been with the Steelers since 2010 and in 2014 signed a contract that runs through the 2018 season.
“I'm working every day,” the 34-year-old said about his rehab. “I'm still not there (health-wise) yet. I don't have a timetable, but I will continue to work.
“I certainly have no intention of stopping what I have been doing in the NFL.”
Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.