Share This Page

Ex-Steelers great Ward says he wants to coach at Georgia

| Thursday, Feb. 18, 2016, 7:12 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-review
Former Steelers receiver Hines Ward smiles on the sideline.

Former Steelers wide receiver great Hines Ward would like to give coaching a shot, provided it's with his alma mater, Georgia.

Ward, who played with the SEC program from 1994-97, told an Atlanta television station “the bug is still there.”

“Television is great, but I've always had the coaching bug, and I really don't want to coach in the NFL,” said Ward, an NBC studio analyst. “If I ever got into coaching, I'd want to give back to my alma mater.”

Ward, 39, the Steelers' all-time leader in receptions, receiving yardage and touchdown receptions, said he would like to be a wide receivers coach. There's one problem: The staff for new coach Kirby Smart — Ward's former college teammate — is complete.

“I have been where these kids want to go, being a Georgia guy,” Ward said. “I live here in Georgia. Georgia is my passion. I think I have a lot to offer. And I always wanted to give back to my university, to give back the knowledge of the game.

“I can see myself walking into recruiting — moms know me from ‘Dancing With the Stars,' dads know me from the Steelers. I can see myself doing some recruiting.”

Ward was an all-SEC receiver with the Bulldogs and left as the team's No. 2 all-time receiver with 144 receptions.

“Hey, Kirby Smart, if you are out there and you want a receivers coach, give me a call,” Ward said. “It would definitely be something that I'd have to think about.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.