Lawmaker wants to scrap vehicle emissions testing
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, March 12, 2012
STATE COLLEGE — Every day, mechanics around the state check gas caps and look under hoods as part of annual vehicle emissions inspections.
But one state lawmaker says residents should no longer have to take their cars in for — and pay for — the annual inspections.
State Sen. John Wozniak, D-Westmont, told the Centre Daily Times that he thinks cleaner cars have made the inspections obsolete.
"I think the test needs to be tested," said Wozniak, who introduced a resolution earlier this year asking the federal government to end the requirement. "Virtually all cars pass the test, and it's time to re-evaluate whether it's just a waste of money for consumers."
PennDOT says about 4 percent of vehicles in the state annually failed the test in the past five years. In 2010, 4.22 percent of vehicles failed, and if one excludes the cases in which gas caps that failed were replaced, resulting in the car passing, the failure rate was only 2.43 percent.
State environmental officials, however, say that despite that the inspections still play an important role in keeping the air clean.
"Motor vehicles are responsible for as much as half of the emissions causing ozone pollution in the commonwealth," said Chris Trostle of the state Department of Environmental Protection's division of air resource management.
Trostle said the federally mandated plan began in 1984 in Pennsylvania, starting with Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and the Lehigh Valley, and now including more than two dozen counties. The federal government requires areas with high population density to have the separate tests.
Wozniak said the program made sense when it was introduced, but no longer.
"Those fleets of cars they were trying to address are long gone," Wozniak said. "The intention was correct decades ago. The law worked. Industry accepted the challenge. Now it's time to move on."
Trostle, however, said even newer vehicles can release more pollution than they were designed to emit due to malfunction or damage.
"The absolute benefits in terms of tons of pollution may be less now that cars are cleaner and more durable, but the program is still needed to ensure that vehicle pollution is addressed," Trostle said. "Without it, air quality would most likely deteriorate."
Others, however, suggest that here may be better ways to protect air quality.
"It appears we're making people have clean cars inspected," said Cheryl Hicks, executive director of the state Senate Democratic Transportation Committee.
J.R. Vratarich, of Tire Town in State College said his shop gets cars from Centre and Blair counties that require a certain level of testing, but they also receive cars from areas with more stringent requirements such as the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh areas. Still other vehicles come from counties, most with smaller populations, that have no separate emissions testing requirements at all.
Vratarich said the differing requirements cause headaches for his garage, and he'd prefer consistency whether the tests stay or go.
"I just wish it would be uniform statewide," he said. "They should use the same criteria in every county."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Dog wardens will canvass state for license compliance
- Louis Freeh gets expedited appeal to Graham Spanier suit
- Three wounded Franklin Regional students in critical condition
- Tobacco companies expected to contest Pennsylvania’s settlement on payments
- Lawrence County cops dress as Amish to target flasher