ShareThis Page

Man killed after struggle over officers' guns, Philadelphia police say

| Saturday, Aug. 12, 2017, 10:48 p.m.

PHILADELPHIA — Police officers shot and killed a man they said tried to grab the guns of first one officer and then another during a confrontation in north Philadelphia, authorities said.

It was the second police shooting in that area of the city in a week.

Officers were responding to a report of a stolen vehicle shortly after 5 p.m. Friday in the Fairhill neighborhood. Police said they met with a woman who pointed out the suspect and said he was stealing her car.

An officer approached the 31-year-old man, who was sitting in the driver's seat, and a struggle ensued during which police said he tried to remove the officer's holstered firearm. When backup officers arrived and drew their weapons, the suspect released the gun but then grabbed another officer's weapon, police said.

“The male did comply initially. He let go of Officer No.1's gun, but then he grabs Officer No. 2's gun and a struggle for that firearms ensued,” Capt. Sekou Kinebrew, of the office of public affairs, told reporters.

The officer “discharged his firearm one time while the offender was holding the barrel, and at the same time (the other two officers) then discharged their firearms,” he said in a statement Saturday.

The man was wounded in the torso and legs and was taken to Temple University Hospital, where he was pronounced dead about a half-hour later. His name wasn't immediately released. No officers or other civilians were injured, police said.

The shooting was the second by Philadelphia police in north Philadelphia in a week. On Monday, police shot and wounded a man who they said opened fire on them during a standoff, sending stray bullets into a nearby home.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.