ShareThis Page

State Senate approves local police using radar to nab speeders

Mary Ann Thomas
| Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017, 4:42 p.m.
A Pennsylvania state trooper checks a motorist's speed with a radar gun along Route 28 near the Cheswick exit.
Tribune-Review file photo
A Pennsylvania state trooper checks a motorist's speed with a radar gun along Route 28 near the Cheswick exit.

The state Senate on Tuesday approved legislation that would allow local police departments to use radar for speed enforcement, according to the Senate Republican Committee.

The legislation, introduced by state Sen. Randy Vulakovich, R-Shaler, goes now to the state House for consideration.

State troopers have been the only police allowed to operate radar in the state since they began using it in 1962.

Pennsylvania is the only state that prohibits municipal police from using radar to catch speeders. Without radar, local police are limited to VASCAR, a system that times how long it takes a vehicle to pass between two marked points on the road.

The measure is supported by the state Chiefs of Police Association, the Pennsylvania Municipal League, state associations of boroughs, township commissioners, township supervisors and mayors, according to the Senate Republican Committee.

Opponents such as the National Motorists Association say expanding radar and lidar (laser) speed guns to municipal police would open the door for speed traps solely to increase municipal revenue.

“Many speed traps occur where the speed limits change,” said James Sikorski Jr., Pennsylvania advocate for the association, in an earlier interview with the Tribune-Review. “When a limit goes down, people may not immediately slow down. When it rises, people speed up slightly before they get to the sign. This stuff is predatory.”

Vulakovich, a former municipal police officer, said, “This measure is long overdue.

“Pennsylvania has not yet provided its law enforcement officers with radar technology that has been around since World War II,” he said. “It is well past time we provide our officers with this speed enforcement mechanism.”

The bill sets conditions, among them: Municipalities must post signs saying they are using radar; points won't be assigned to speeders caught traveling less than 10 mph over the speed limit, and municipalities must certify the accuracy of their radar equipment.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4691, mthomas@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.