ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Gunman who pledged allegiance to ISIS after shooting Philly cop sentenced

| Monday, May 14, 2018, 10:21 p.m.
In this frame from a Thursday, Jan. 7, 2016 video provided by the Philadelphia Police Department, Edward Archer runs with a gun toward a police car driven by Officer Jesse Hartnett in Philadelphia.
Philadelphia Police Department
In this frame from a Thursday, Jan. 7, 2016 video provided by the Philadelphia Police Department, Edward Archer runs with a gun toward a police car driven by Officer Jesse Hartnett in Philadelphia.
In this file handout photo obtained January 8, 2016 courtesy of the Philadelphia Police Department, shows shooting suspect Edward Archer, 30 in Philadelphia.
AFP/Getty Images
In this file handout photo obtained January 8, 2016 courtesy of the Philadelphia Police Department, shows shooting suspect Edward Archer, 30 in Philadelphia.
Philadelphia police Officer Jesse Hartnett, 33, was ambushed and  shot 3 times on Jan. 7, 2016, in Philadelphia. After his arrest, suspect Edward Archer stated, 'I follow Allah and pledge allegiance to the Islamic State, and that is the reason I did what I did.'
Getty Images
Philadelphia police Officer Jesse Hartnett, 33, was ambushed and shot 3 times on Jan. 7, 2016, in Philadelphia. After his arrest, suspect Edward Archer stated, 'I follow Allah and pledge allegiance to the Islamic State, and that is the reason I did what I did.'

A Delaware County man was sentenced Monday to nearly 50 years in prison for shooting a Philadelphia police officer in an ISIS-inspired ambush attack in 2016.

Edward Archer did not visibly react as Common Pleas Court Judge Leon W. Tucker imposed the sentence of 48½ to 97 years — the maximum allowed. As he had throughout his trial this year, Archer refused to identify himself and mostly declined to respond to the judge or to his lawyers, saying he was loyal only to Allah.

The man he shot, Officer Jesse Hartnett, testified briefly at the hearing, saying Archer — whom he did not know before the assault — fired more than a dozen shots at him purely because of the car he drove and the uniform he wore. He said Archer displayed "cowardice" and deserved the stiffest penalty allowed by law.

"He was on a mission," said Hartnett. "A mission to kill."

Assistant District Attorney Jan McDermott also read several statements from Hartnett's relatives, describing the officer's physical limitations in the aftermath of the crime — including the need to perform most tasks with only one arm — and the emotional impact on his family.

"We are extremely blessed that he is alive," Hartnett's father, Bob, said in a statement read by McDermott.

McDermott asked Tucker to impose the maximum allowable penalty against Archer, and his attorneys voiced little in the way of opposition.

Archer, of Yeadon, fired while the officer sat alone in his patrol car in West Philadelphia on Jan. 7, 2016. Hartnett was struck in an arm but managed to open his door with his feet and return fire as Archer ran away.

After being apprehended, Archer told investigators he had acted out of allegiance to the Islamic State. He has refused to participate in his own defense, declining to talk to his lawyers or submit to mental health evaluations.

Investigators have found no link between Archer and any organized terror organization. His lawyer, Trevan Borum, said Monday that he believes Archer to be mentally ill — possibly schizophrenic and certainly suffering from delusions.

Archer, in a brief outburst in court, denied his lawyer's diagnosis, saying he was not schizophrenic and that "I don't have no mental defects." He refused to say anything else.

As he was led out of the courtroom, his mother, who was in the gallery, said, "Love you, Ed," while his sister cried. They declined to speak with reporters afterward.

Borum said he was unsure whether Archer was remorseful. As for Hartnett, he said the officer "is probably the bravest man alive."

Monday's proceeding likely ends a chapter of city history that attracted international attention and was even mentioned by presidential candidates during the 2016 campaign. It occurred just days into the new tenures of Mayor Kenney and Commissioner Richard Ross, thrusting a spotlight on the city administration.

During a two-week trial in January, prosecutors presented evidence including surveillance video of the attack, ballistics and DNA tests, and Archer's recorded interrogation, during which he said he had acted out of religious inspiration. Jurors deliberated for less than three hours before convicting him of counts including attempted murder, assault against a law enforcement officer, and weapons charges.

Ross on Monday said Hartnett's actions after the shooting were "nothing short of miraculous." He also said that the Police Department has been installing ballistics shields in the side windows of cars to help protect against similar ambushes.

Hartnett, who has undergone at least 11 surgeries since the shooting and had a unique set of metal braces inserted into his elbow, said he was pleased that the judge agreed to impose a long sentence to reflect what he described as an indiscriminate and selfish assault.

Since that day, Hartnett has gotten married, had a daughter, and harbored hopes of returning to active duty. He said Monday that he's unsure if he'll be able to fulfill that goal due to the constraints on his arm. Still, he said, he "would never change anything" about his life.

"I absolutely love this job," Hartnett said. "If I could take it all back, I would still be a Philadelphia police officer. I wouldn't change a thing."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me