California University OKs $175K settlement to professor
A professor at California University of Pennsylvania who claims she was denied promotions and was sexually harassed will receive $175,000 from the university, according to a settlement obtained by the Tribune-Review under the state's Right to Know Law.
Dr. Linda Toth, a psychology professor, filed suit in 2009 claiming that she was denied promotions twice and was sexually harassed when she appealed the denial personally to former university president Angelo Armenti, who held and stroked her hand during a meeting, according to the suit.
Cal U will pay $175,000 for attorneys' fees and Toth's compensatory damages, including emotional distress and reputation loss. If Toth applies for another promotion and earns the necessary scores, she will be promoted, according to the agreement.
Christine Kindl, spokeswoman for the university, declined to comment.
In an email sent on Monday, Armenti declined to comment because he said he had not seen the agreement.
Toth signed the agreement on June 30. Acting President Geraldine Jones signed it on July 30. The agreement went into effect Aug. 15.
If the suit had gone to trial, court records indicate testimony would have exposed the university's management and internal politics in regard to Armenti's firing of several female administrators without reason. The university was forced to pay more than $400,000 in settlement agreements to the women, court records show.
Toth, who was president of the faculty union, was hired as a psychology professor in 1990. She received tenure in 2003 and first applied for promotion from associate to full professor in 2005. Even though a department committee recommended her promotion, it was denied by Armenti the following year, according to the suit.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6220 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.