ShareThis Page

GOP lawmakers say Corbett's lottery privatization plan needs legislative approval

| Friday, Dec. 7, 2012, 11:38 p.m.

HARRISBURG — Some GOP lawmakers question Republican Gov. Tom Corbett's lottery privatization plan that would allow keno games in taverns, bars and restaurants.

Introducing keno, a bingo-like lottery game, over the next five years would expand the state's gambling and, therefore, require legislative approval, lawmakers in both parties say.

“I believe a lot of (Republican) members think legislative approval is needed for an expansion of gambling,” said Stephen Miskin, spokesman for House Republicans, the majority party.

Yet Corbett would not need lawmakers' approval to accept, by month's end, the lone bid for 20-year management of the Pennsylvania Lottery by Camelot Global Services PA LLC, an offshoot of the company that runs the United Kingdom's National Lottery, said Corbett's spokesman Kevin Harley.

Nor does Corbett need legislative approval for the keno portion of the contract, Harley said.

The goal is to boost lottery revenue for senior programs, said Department of Revenue spokeswoman Elizabeth Brassell. By 2030, more than one-fourth of the state's population will be 65 or older.

The lottery had sales of $3.2 billion in 2010-11 and provided more than $960 million for senior programs, ranging from low-cost prescription drugs, free and reduced transit, and property tax and rent rebates.

The state would own the lottery under the proposal, Brassell said.

Pennsylvania would join 14 states with keno, she said, a game similar to Pennsylvania's defunct Super 7 game but with drawings throughout the day.

Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry, said he generally supports privatization. But the keno portion of the proposal “needs legislative approval,” Metcalfe said. If Corbett proceeds with the contract and the keno games, “I'd expect he'd be sued.”

“I think it would be a grave mistake to alienate conservatives supportive of privatization and, at the same time, thumb your nose at the Legislature,” Metcalfe said. “It deserves debate on the (House) floor. It deserves debate in the Senate.”

Bill Patton, spokesman for House Democrats, called keno and online gaming “major expansions” of legalized gambling in Pennsylvania.

“We believe it does require legislative approval. It is wrong to make a change of this magnitude by a secretive administrative process. This needs careful consideration and public input,” he said.

Patton's boss, House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont, this week summed up the proposal: “The whole thing stinks.”

Bidding is closed, Brassell said. She argued the process was transparent — available for public review at

Said Senate Republican spokesman Erik Arneson: “We are reviewing it.”

Senate Democratic leaders, in the minority party, have voiced opposition.

With a sole bidder, the idea is “raising some red flags,” said Rep. Glen Grell, R-Mechanicsburg. That can lead to questions about whether officials wrote a bid proposal in a way to exclude others, Grell said.

It's not clear what the Corbett administration would do for some state lottery employees who likely would lose jobs, Grell said. Some are his constituents.

The impact from keno might not be as dramatic as some think.

West Virginia authorized keno games in 1992 as part of its lottery, founded in 1986. With total lottery revenue of $1.5 billion, keno raised $6.2 million of that as of June 30, said West Virginia lottery spokesman Dean Patrick.

West Virginia's lottery funds tourism, education and senior programs, Patrick said.

Eugene DePasquale, Pennsylvania auditor general-elect, questions whether Corbett could move ahead on a contract.

Asked about the sole bidder, DePasquale said not many firms are qualified to manage a lottery the size of Pennsylvania's. He said he would work to ensure money goes toward senior programs.

Brad Bumsted is the state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.