8 PSU students charged in fall that injured cheerleader
STATE COLLEGE — Eight Penn State students furnished alcohol to minors at a party where a university cheerleader fell from a fifth-floor window, suffering serious injuries, police said on Tuesday.
Paige Raque, 19, suffered head and pelvic injuries when she fell 39 feet out of a screened window of a downtown State College apartment in October. Police ruled the fall an accident.
Authorities said in a statement that criminal complaints for misdemeanor charges of furnishing alcohol to minors and related offenses were filed and that the eight defendants would receive summonses.
Of the eight charged, five were younger than 21.
Four of the defendants, including two 21-year-olds, were former cheerleaders who had been removed from the team last week for an unspecified violation of team rules. A fifth defendant, 20, has been removed from the dance team, the school said Tuesday.
University spokeswoman Lisa Powers said the students might be sanctioned by the university once the school conducts its review of the police report.
“We are still concerned for Paige's recovery,” Powers said. “This was a tragic and unfortunate accident that could have been avoided.”
Raque returned home to Louisville, Ky., for her recovery. Her family has said Raque still suffers from nerve pain in her feet and struggles with toe movement but is doing well overall with cognitive and physical therapy.
Raque, a sophomore, suffered a severe brain injury and broke her pelvis. She could not talk or walk after the fall, but she held a news conference in December when she was released from a rehabilitation facility in Kentucky.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.