ShareThis Page

Pa. panel seeks to limit municipalities from challenges to tax-exempt status

| Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2013, 11:46 p.m.

A proposed amendment to constitutionally limit the ability of Pennsylvania municipalities to challenge the tax-exempt status of charities and nonprofits got the endorsement of the state Senate Finance Committee Wednesday and is on its way to the full Senate.

The committee approved the measure on a 9-2 vote, with Democrats John Wozniak of Johnstown and Robert Teplitz of Harrisburg voting in opposition.

But amending the state Constitution is a lengthy process. The soonest it could be done is 2017.

Pennsylvania hospitals are the driving force behind the amendment, which they say would clarify the definition of a public charity. It would enable nonprofits to regain ground lost in a 2012 state Supreme Court ruling that denied public charity status to a summer camp in Pike County.

“Our goal with Senate Bill 4 is simple: To give the Legislature the sole authority to establish criteria for a tax exemption, thereby providing a clear avenue to protecting our charities which serve the interests of our communities throughout this Commonwealth,” said Sen. Mike Brubaker, a Lancaster Republican and committee chairman.

Opponents, which include the Pennsylvania Municipal League, the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Commissioners and Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner, say the amendment could place unfair tax burdens on residents and businesses.

“This would be the farthest-reaching constitutional amendment in my lifetime with a negative impact on every taxpayer and local government in the Commonwealth,” Wagner said.

The issue is an important one in Allegheny County, where nonprofits, such as UPMC and the West Penn Allegheny Health System, own billions of dollars of tax-exempt property.

Allegheny County is asking thousands of nonprofit organizations to demonstrate why their properties should continue to be exempt from taxes.

In places like Monroeville, changing the tax-exempt status of Forbes Regional Hospital and UPMC are a priority of some elected officials because of the money they could generate for the community.

According to Wagner, the value of untaxed property in Allegheny County is $17 billion out of $59 billion in total assessed properties.

The measure requires passage by the General Assembly in two consecutive legislative sessions before being placed on the ballot as a referendum.

The amendment's supporters include the YMCA, the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, the Association of Independent Universities & Colleges of Pennsylvania and the Hospital & Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania, which helped draft it.

“We think the law as it stands could lead to costly litigation and challenges to nonprofit hospital and other nonprofits,” said Roger Baumgarten, a spokesman for the association, which represents about 225 health care providers.

Since last year's Supreme Court ruling, the tax-exempt status of Warren Hospital, Warren County YMCA, Habitat for Humanity and other non-profit organizations have been revoked.

Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.