Shale fees to benefit southwestern Pennsylvania conservation districts
Five southwestern Pennsylvania counties will receive $272,000 in state grants funded by Marcellus shale drilling fees to promote local conservation efforts.
The grants are from the state Unconventional Gas Well Fund, created by the Legislature in 2012 to help all county conservation districts continue services.
Conservation districts statewide will equally share $1.5 million in block grants. Another $1.5 million is distributed through a formula based on the number of gas wells in a region.
The Washington County Conservation District will receive $83,758, the third-highest amount in the state. Greene County receives $69,871. Westmoreland County receives $50,341, while Allegheny and Beaver counties will each receive more than $34,000, according to an announcement last week.
“These grants will help fund the important work of county conservation districts,” said State Sen. Tim Solobay, D-Canonsburg. “Learning better ways to use and save resources while teaching stewardship to citizens is an important part of our effort to preserve and improve the environment of the region.”
Pennsylvania's conservation districts were created in 1945 to work with departments of state government, private businesses, farmers and educators to encourage good planning and to educate the community on the best ways to preserve natural resources, Solabay said.
Act 13 provides the first dedicated funding source for conservation districts.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.