Democrats criticize Corbett administration for moving slowly on voter ID law
HARRISBURG — Democrats on the House budget-writing committee on Thursday accused the Corbett administration of not doing enough to prepare for the possibility that Pennsylvania's embattled voter-identification law will be enforced in the Nov. 5 general election.
The lawmakers questioned Secretary of State Carol Aichele about Gov. Tom Corbett's decision not to include money for outreach efforts in his 2013-14 budget plan, even though the law could be in full effect — or overturned — by the time voters head to the polls then.
“This (law) has created tremendous confusion,” said Rep. Matthew Bradford, D-Montgomery. “People have no idea what the status of their ability to vote is. We're going to have to educate people. There's got to be some appropriation for that.”
Aichele defended her department's efforts, saying it spent $4.9 million in federal money last year on a multimedia campaign to explain the new requirement that all voters show photo ID at the polls.
“There is a high level of awareness about voter ID across Pennsylvania,” Aichele asserted in testimony before the House Appropriations Committee.
Even though the law was signed in March 2012, the requirement never has been enforced because of a pending lawsuit challenging its constitutionality.
A court order barred voter ID from taking effect as scheduled in the presidential election and will remain in force in the May 21 primary. A trial in Commonwealth Court is scheduled for July, although case is ultimately expected to be settled by the state Supreme Court. It's not clear, however, whether the matter will be settled before the Nov. 5 election.
The bill was approved in the Legislature without a single Democratic vote, touching off a politically polarized debate.
Democrats said the measure was a thinly veiled attempt by Republicans to discourage minorities, senior citizens and other Democratic-leaning groups from voting. Republicans said the bill provided protection against voter fraud.
Aichele said on Thursday that she has no evidence and knows of no incidents of voter fraud in the Nov. 6 presidential election.
She said federal money is not available for a similar voter-education blitz this year because there are no federal elections and that no state funds for that purpose are included in Corbett's budget plan for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
Once the court case is resolved, the state will “do everything in our power, within our means,” to ensure voters understand the law, she said. If a judge or the Legislature orders a special outreach campaign, the administration would comply.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.