Corbett expected to resubmit Pa. lottery deal
HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Corbett plans to ask Attorney General Kathleen Kane's office to reverse its rejection of a contract with a British firm to manage the $3.5 billion Pennsylvania Lottery, a top lawmaker said on Tuesday.
Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati said administration officials told him on Monday that they are making changes in the contract with London-based Camelot Global Services that Kane rejected last month over concerns that parts of it contravene the state constitution or violate state law.
The changes are in preparation to resubmit it for her approval, Scarnati said.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Revenue, which oversees the lottery, declined comment, except to say that certain changes to the contract would not trigger the need for a new round of bidding. The spokeswoman, Elizabeth Brassell, said the Corbett administration would say more later this week, once it announces its next steps. The administration has a Saturday deadline to appeal Kane's decision in court.
However, the head of the union that represents lottery employees, David Fillman, said making changes to the contract is “a very dangerous path” because of state laws meant to ensure a fair contracting process.
The changes described by Scarnati would limit the scope of gambling that would be allowed under the contract. Senate Republicans, including Scarnati, had asked Corbett's administration in January to make it clear that the Pennsylvania Lottery cannot compete with casinos through online gambling.
“They are working on language similar to ours in the contract that would address our concerns,” Scarnati, R-Jefferson, said.
A draft of legislation written by Sen. Robert Tomlinson, R-Bucks, would legalize keno and the use of a computer mouse to scratch off instant tickets, but it otherwise would prohibit the lottery or its private manager from offering Internet-based or monitor-based interactive games or casino-style games, including video poker, video roulette and video blackjack. The bill has not been introduced yet.
Kane had said she would not approve Camelot's 20- to 30-year contract because state law does not allow the governor to privatize the management of the lottery nor does it allow the expansion of gambling that the contract would permit. Her office also concluded that the “indirect expenses” that Camelot can claim under the contract are an unconstitutional waiver of the state's “sovereign immunity” protection against paying certain damages or claims.
The attorney general's office reviews state contracts for form and legality.
Corbett has said he believes Camelot, the United Kingdom's official lottery operator, can produce higher and more stable lottery profits for the state. Democratic lawmakers have criticized Corbett as diverting money from programs for the elderly to a foreign firm at a time when the state employees who run the lottery are achieving strong gains in profits and sales and keeping overhead low.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.