Ice, wind bring down lines across Fayette
Traffic on Route 119 is forced to exit at Gallatin Avenue because downed live wires blocked the highway near Penn State Fayette The Eberly Campus on Monday March 18, 2013.
Photo by Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier
A combination of ice and gusty winds on Monday brought down several utility poles in Fayette County, including one that left wires down across Route 119 near the Penn State Fayette campus in North Union.
About 5,000 West Penn Power customers were without power at the peak of the outages, company spokesman Todd Meyers said.
“It was sort of an odd combination of about a quarter-inch of ice coating lines and poles, and we had some pretty strong gusts of wind,” Meyers said.
In the Route 119 incident, two utility poles fell, bringing lines down across the four-lane highway around noon. The incident caused about 1,100 customers to lose power.
Crews had restored power to most of those customers and removed the wires from the roadway by 3 p.m., Meyers said.
Similar large outages occurred in the areas around Fairchance, York Run and the east side of Uniontown, he said.
Most customers had their power restored by late afternoon, but Meyers anticipated scattered outages would remain throughout the night.
Meyers said crews from Washington, Butler and Westmoreland counties were brought in to assist in Fayette after the utility determined they weren't needed in their home areas.
Jennifer Reeger is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6155 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.