Mother recalls Dubois Marine killed in Nevada blast
DUBOIS — The mother of a young man from Dubois who was killed by an explosion during a training exercise said he wanted to be a Marine since he was a young boy.
Karen Perry met Wednesday with the Marine Corps to plan funeral arrangements for Pfc. Josh Martino, 19, a native of Dubois.
"Since he was probably 8 years old he wanted to be a Marine," she said. "That's all he wanted to do."
She first heard a radio news report about the Monday accident at Hawthorne Army Depot in Nevada, then three Marines showed up at her workplace on Tuesday to say he was one of the seven who were killed. Eight Marines were injured.
Josh Martino, known as Tino to his friends, played football and ran track at Dubois Area Senior High School, liked to snowboard and was an avid hunter.
"If anybody reads any of his Facebook comments, which there's hundreds of them being posted, he loved to talk," Perry said. "He always got himself into trouble for that."
She said Martino, stationed at Camp Lejeune, N.C., was in Nevada for training in preparation for being shipped out to Afghanistan. He hoped to marry his fiancee later this year, before the deployment. He had joined the Marine Corps in July.
Their last communication was Sunday, by text message, just about "things in general, what they were doing," Perry said.
"Things had been a little rough out there when they were up in the mountains for a couple weeks," she said.
Investigators are trying to figure out why a mortar shell exploded in its firing tube at an ammunition depot, sending out the shrapnel that killed and injured the Marines.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.