ShareThis Page

11 ex-PSU football players critical of trustee

| Tuesday, April 2, 2013, 9:24 p.m.

STATE COLLEGE — Eleven former Penn State football players including Franco Harris are calling for a fellow former player to be voted off the school's board of trustees because of how the panel handled the fallout from the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal, including firing longtime coach Joe Paterno.

The board member, former Nittany Lions linebacker Paul Suhey, said in a statement that while he made a “stunningly unpopular decision,” his obligation as a trustee was to vote his conscience.

In a letter dated last week and addressed to other former players, the group said the board's actions tarnished the reputation and legacy of Paterno, the football program and coaches and players who had nothing to do with the scandal. The NCAA levied severe sanctions on the program for the scandal, including strict scholarship cuts and a four-year bowl ban.

Among the signers of the letter were former running back Lydell Mitchell, quarterbacks Todd Blackledge and Michael Robinson and linebacker Brandon Short.

Suhey is one 39 candidates vying for three alumni-elected seats on the board, and one of two incumbents along with board vice chair Stephanie Deviney. The third seat is open. Voting begins on April 10 and closes May 2.

Sandusky, 69, was sentenced to at least 30 years in prison following his conviction last summer of dozens of counts of abuse. The letter from former players began by saying they were horrified by Sandusky's actions, and that their thoughts and prayers remained with the victims and their families.

“Also horrifying has been the ensuing damage inflicted to the standing of our university due in large part to the failure of the Board of Trustees,” the letter said. “It is for this reason that we are compelled to step forward and oppose Paul Suhey's re-election to the board.”

The 11 ex-players wrote that they took action knowing it might cause division among the tight-knit community of lettermen. “It is not a role we relish, but it is one we believe is necessary to prevent any further damage to our university,” they wrote.

Suhey said in a statement late last week that one of the lessons passed down from his coaches was that good leaders can't be afraid of doing the right thing because it's unpopular. He said Paterno taught him the importance of integrity.

“My responsibility is to do what I think is right for the university that I love. I had to make what I knew would be a stunningly unpopular decision but I believed then, as I believe now for many reasons, that it was the right decision,” he wrote.

He concluded that he understood that there were others who believe the board made the wrong decision. “I am OK with that and I respect the opinions of others who disagree with me,” he said.

Besides the former players in the letter, some vocal alumni critics have been angry with Suhey and Deviney. The watchdog group Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship has taken out ads against the incumbents.

In an email Tuesday confirming his statement, Suhey added that negative attacks against alumni trustees had no place at Penn State.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.