Coal Country Hangout research project reintroduces Johnstown students to their own backyard
JOHNSTOWN — Fourteen high school students from the Coal Country Hangout have been researching their backyard.
Through the direction of Deacon Ann Staples, executive director of the Coal Country Youth Center, the students discovered that the coal town of Moss Creek was walled off from the rest of the world.
Founded in 1902, Moss Creek was walled off to keep away union agitators who sought to stir up local coal workers. Residents of the coal town had to sign in and out to come and go.
Moss Creek was privately owned until the mid-1940s when it was sold to the local water authority, which owned it until the 1980s. The students are researching all of Moss Creek's buildings, interviewing residents and searching for remains of the wall.
Staples said the students hope to have a video documentary completed by June. They are working with the Cambria County Historical Society in their efforts to learn more about local history.
Staples said the project is important because most students don't get to learn much beyond their school's curriculum.
“Their studies concentrate on national or state history,” she said, “and sometimes they might not know what is around in their own backyard.”
Staples said the project is voluntary and not required for graduation or a grade.
“It's so popular that the minute (projects) are said out loud, they're signed up,” she said.
All of the Coal Country Hangout projects are grant funded, and this project is funded by the Pennsylvania Humanities Council.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.