State House panel seeks delay in release of arrest warrants
A state House of Representatives committee recently passed a resolution urging the Supreme Court to alter rules that would allow prosecutors to delay the release of information on arrest warrants to the public.
The resolution, which got the unanimous endorsement of the judiciary committee, would allow prosecutors to delay the public release of a warrant for 10 days or until it has been executed, whichever comes first. Prosecutors could also seek a further delay if good cause is shown.
State Rep. Tarah Toohil, R-Luzerne County, has expressed concern about the current rules, which allow the public and members of the news media to immediately obtain a copy of the warrant from a district judge.
The media often prints information on the case before the person is arrested, potentially putting law enforcement at risk and compromising the criminal case, she said.
“It's important for officers' safety,” Toohil said. “If arrest warrant information is put out, the way technology is, it goes out on the Internet. Often people who are going to be arrested find out before the officer gets to the door.”
Melissa Melewsky, an attorney with the The Pennsylvania Newspaper Association, said the association opposes the rule change, believing it goes too far and would needlessly delay the dissemination of public information.
“It allows for arrest warrants to be sealed indefinitely. That clearly raises a constitutional issue,” Melewsky said. “We don't want law enforcement to be at risk, but we believe the proposal goes too far.”
Melewsky noted there are safeguards in place now that allow police to file a petition with county court to seal a warrant if good cause is shown. The proposed rule change would make that process easier for police by extending that right to district judges.
The House resolution will go to the floor for a vote. If passed, it would serve as an endorsed recommendation of the House, but would have no legal bearing on the court rule, which can only be changed by the Supreme Court.
Jim Koval, a spokesman for the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, said the Supreme Court is considering the matter. It's not known when it will issue a ruling.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Magicians conjure up efforts to restore Houdini’s gravesite
- 7 hurt in buggy, SUV crash in Pennsylvania Dutch country
- Researchers at Pa.’s top universities take to the web to fund projects
- Ex-House Democratic leader DeWeese seeks new trial
- $250,000 in Rolexes taken from Altoona mall
- Beds needed for thousands hoping to see pope in Philly
- Crawford County man gets prison — and lecture — for tattooing 12-year-old
- DEP awaiting tests for ‘cat urine’ smell in New Castle
- Ohio woman shot to death nearly 3 days before police find body in Neshannock home
- Attorney general Kane reverses claim about child porn in emails
- Pennsylvania legislative leader Costa blasts suggestion of session before Wolf sworn in as governor