Share This Page

School shooter in Ohio appealing life sentence

| Monday, April 22, 2013, 9:45 p.m.

WARREN, Ohio — A teenager who wore a T-shirt with “killer” scrawled across it and gestured obscenely at his sentencing has appealed his life prison term for killing three students in a school cafeteria.

The court-appointed attorney for T.J. Lane, 18, filed the appeal on Thursday with the 11th Ohio District Court of Appeals challenging his sentence handed down in Chardon last month. The brief filing also cited the decision moving his case to adult court.

Lane was 17 at the time of the shooting rampage in February 2012.

His court-appointed attorney, Michael Partlow, said Monday a key focus would be whether a juvenile at the time of a crime can be sentenced to life without chance of parole.

Geauga County Prosecutor James Flaiz said the appeal had been expected. “I feel strongly the judge's sentence will be upheld and we will vigorously defend the sentence and work on the appeal in our office,” he told The (Willoughby) News-Herald.

Lane pleaded guilty in February to the shooting rampage at Chardon High School, east of Cleveland. Investigators have said he admitted to the shooting but said he didn't know why he did it.

At his sentencing, Lane wore a T-shirt with “killer” scrawled across it and cursed and gestured obscenely to relatives of victims gathered in the hushed courtroom.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.