HARRISBURG — A central Pennsylvania woman who was shot five times by the man convicted on Friday of fatally shooting her daughter says she nonetheless does not want the killer to receive the death penalty.
Instead, Lithz Serrano says they want 25-year-old Miguel Figueroa-Novoa to spend life in prison thinking about his deeds and having to explain why he killed his son's mother.
Figueroa-Novoa was convicted of killing his girlfriend, 19-year-old Yarelis Berrios, and shooting Serrano, her mother, in a Harrisburg apartment in December 2010.
A cousin who was then 9 grabbed the couple's 2-year-old son and fled the shootings, which included a botched suicide by Figueroa-Novoa.
A new phase of the trial will begin on Monday, after which a jury must decide whether Figueroa-Novoa deserves the death penalty or life in prison without parole.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.