ShareThis Page

Winter bee deaths devastate keepers

| Saturday, May 18, 2013, 7:32 p.m.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Beekeeper Lee Miller of Economy marked one of his queen bees with a red marker to keep track of her Friday, May 17, 2013. One beehive box alone can house an estimated 15,000 honeybees.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Beekeeper Lee Miller of Economy holds a frame from one of his hives Friday, May 17, 2013. On the left side, are 9-21 day old larvae that are capped with wax. One beehive can house an estimated 15,000 bees alone.
Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Beekeeper Lee Miller of Economy, looks over his honeybees in his yard Friday, May 17, 2013.

Problems that decimated the nation's largest commercial hives are affecting backyard beekeepers, who say losses of bees this past winter were the worst ever.

“My highest loss before this last winter was 33 percent,” said Steve Repasky of Dormont, president of Burgh Bees, a nonprofit group that offers beekeeping classes. He typically sells about 800 pounds of honey each year, but only 12 of his 35 hives survived the winter.

“It's by far the worst year ever. This is the first winter nationwide that small backyard beekeepers have had such steep losses,” he said.

Such losses could put a dent in backyard and community gardens this summer, which depend on bees for pollination of foods such as apples, broccoli, celery, peaches, squash, tomatoes and strawberries, agricultural experts said.

“Bees produce honey and food for all of us, and they are under lots of stress,” said Lee Miller of Economy, a former president of the Pennsylvania State Beekeepers Association.

Colony collapse disorder occurs when worker bees from a hive abruptly disappear. The cause is undetermined, but when coupled with exposure to pesticides and a proliferation of mites carrying viruses, the effect is devastating.

Nearly one-third of managed honeybees in the United States died during the winter, up from 22 percent from the previous winter. It's a level of loss that threatens about 70 agricultural crops that depend on pollination, according to a survey released this month by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and two industry groups.

Bees in urban areas account for 80 percent of pollination of wildflowers, home gardens and increasingly popular community gardens.

Miller, who manages about 40 bee colonies, lost half of them over the winter — the most ever. Beekeepers in Western Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan were particularly hard hit, he said.

“I think it had something to do with the weather last year. There was a relatively dry summer. The amount and quality of nectar and pollen was less than adequate, and bees were weakened,” Miller said.

The dry summer — a drought in much of the Midwest — followed a mild winter and abnormally early spring last year. Apple and cherry blossoms appeared five weeks early.

“The early spring gave mites more time to grow. Controlling mites is getting harder. We are still seeing very high levels of loss for many reasons. It's not just colony collapse disorder,” said Dennis van Engelsdorp, a research scientist at the University of Maryland and honeybee expert.

Jana Thompson, who lives in Pittsburgh's Mexican War Streets in the North Side, keeps two beehives.

“After winter, there were maybe 150 bees left in one of them,” Thompson said.

Bee colonies house 20,000 to 30,000 bees. Thompson since replenished her colonies.

Repasky is scrambling to rebuild his beehives by splitting colonies and collecting swarms. Last week, he collected a swarm from the backyard of a Pine resident.

“It's better to use a swarm to make a new colony than to kill bees by spraying them,” he said.

The total number of managed honeybee colonies in the United States has fallen from about 5 million in the 1940s to 2.6 million, according to the USDA, though demand for pollination services increased. Without honeybees, the USDA estimates, the nation would lose crops valued at $20 billion to $30 billion.

Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.